Vincent J. Curtis
22 Sept 2016
In his last speech to the United Nations as president,
Barack Obama read the following off his teleprompter:
"If we are honest, we know that no external power is
going to be able to force different religious communities or ethnic communities
to co-exist for long,"
You have to wonder if the man who read that statement
understood what he just said. In
practice, Obama wants to bring into the United States large numbers of Syrian
Muslims as refugees. If no external
power such as the various levels of government in the United States can force
difference ethnic and religious communities to co-exist for long, then why is
he importing the potential for religious and ethnic conflict into the country
he is the president of?
Barack Obama is the president of the American people, he is
in no wise responsible for the care of Syrian refugees beyond the foreign
assistance expected from the world’s most powerful and richest nation. Yet here he is following a plan that he knows
will result in the creation of ethnic and religious strife in the United
States.
Obama went on the say, "Until basic questions are answered about how
communities co-exist, the embers of extremism will continue to burn. Countless
human beings will suffer."
Let’s completely agree with that statement. Given that Obama admits that no one knows how
communities can co-exist, and that until that question is answered ‘the embers
of extremism will continue to burn’ and ‘countless human being will suffer.’
why is Obama trying to import large numbers of Syrian refugees into
America? Muslim communities in the
United States constitute a distinct religious community, and being of either
Arabic or Somalian origin, constitute a distinct ethnic community as well. Why is Obama trying to import into the United
States fresh burning embers of extremism?
Aren’t countless human beings going to suffer – in the
United States? Isn’t Obama as president
of the United States committed to promoting the general welfare of the United States? Importing causes of disturbance of the civil
peace is utterly at odds with general welfare of the United States!
Aren’t the riots presently going on in Charlotte, NC, enough
for him? Does America need even more
civil strife Mr. Obama?
In a less-than-subtle jab at Donald Trump, Obama said, "The world is
too small for us to simply be able to build a wall and prevent (extremism) from
affecting our own societies." Obama
then met with Israeli Prime Minister Bibi Netanyahu. Israel built a wall between Israel and the
West Bank that has completed halted terrorist attacks in Israel that once
originated in the West Bank.
Obama answers his own question: a wall is a way of keeping separate
communities that cannot co-exist peacefully.
If that wall is maintained, the community protected by the wall can live
in peace. It can flourish on its own
without the civil strife implicit in the intermixing of distinctive and hostile
ethnic and religious communities.
Barack Obama read his speech from his teleprompter. The words seemingly went from the screen and through
his mouth without passing through his mind.
It gets worse. Obama
is at pains not to link acts of terrorism committed by Muslims in the United
States with any outside group, such as ISIS.
At most, Obama will say that perpetrators of terrorist acts were not
upholding true Islam. Again, let’s take
that as read.
What becomes necessary, then, is that members of the Muslim
community in the United States spontaneously
go thermonuclear, just as it is a matter of random chance which radioactive
atomic nuclei will be the one to spontaneously fission. We don’t know which one, but statistically we
know that a certain number will in a certain time period. And Obama wants to import entire communities
of people of whom we know statistically will produce a certain number of
thermonuclear events in a given period of time!
Putting down ISIS won’t stop it, because domestic Islamic
terrorism isn’t inspired by ISIS, according to Obama. Correct interpretations of Islam won’t solve
the problem either because the known terrorists have interpretations of Islam
that are in accordance with ISIS - whether that interpretation is correct or
not.
Islam is not a religion capable of living in peace with its
neighbors. Islam cannot accept inferior
status. Islam cannot accept status of
equality. Islam has to be dominant. Islam has to hold all other religions and
atheism in inferior status. That is not
solvable by reasoned argument. That is
the nature of the beast.
Since it is the nature of the beast to dominate, and since
no external power can force different religious communities to co-exist for
long, the aggressive nature of Islam cannot be permanently contained by
external force. Islamic violence against
its failure to be dominant must eventually break out. And it breaks out in America precisely
because Islam is not dominant.
Obama knows this, and yet he insists on more Muslim
immigration to America. Obama may read,
but not understand the implications of, the words on his teleprompter. But that cannot prevent thinking people from
putting two and two together on their own.
Donald Trump is practical enough to see that a good wall and
strong immigration controls can be effective barriers that keeps the people
behind them safe from external threats.
He came to this conclusion not reading it from a teleprompter but by his
own practical thinking. Trump, by the
way, is running to be president of the United
States.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment