Vincent J. Curtis
14 Aug 2016
In the course of savaging FBI Director James Comey over
Hillary’s email scandal, Bill revealed that he knows a lot about matter. One wonders how much legal and political consulting
Bill did on behalf of Hillary.
Bill ridiculed that only a few of the emails were marked
classified, and argued that the emails that were so marked on the merits should
not have been classified. Thus,
when emails are marked classified, Bill argues that on the merits they shouldn’t
be; while if on the merits they ought to be classified, Hillary argues that
they weren’t marked. A remarkable
defense.
Bill also revealed that he understood perfectly what
classification markings at the beginning of a paragraph meant, while Hillary
told the FBI that she did not know what a (C) meant at the beginning of a
paragraph in a memo containing a mixture of classified and unclassified
material, a shocking state of affairs for a classification authority within the
US government and from a person with so much experience in handling classified
material. This goes to the heart of the
issue concerning Hillary’s actual competence or in the alternative, her
truthfulness. She wants us to believe could
never be bothered to ask the experts at her beck and call over four years as
Secretary of State what those symbols meant.
Anyhow, Hillary’s defense amounts to a thin tissue of lies
that can’t hold together upon the slightest examination.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment