Friday, December 1, 2017

The Brotherhood argues against Quebec Bill 62

Vincent J. Curtis

2 Nov 2017

You have to hand it to Raza Khan.  Two days after another ISIS inspired terrorist attack occurs in New York City by a Muslim immigrant, this veritable spokesman for the Muslim Brotherhood is out there defending the right of Muslims to mask their faces in Canada.

Khan admits that the wearing of facial coverings by Muslim women is a choice – a choice he argues must be respected by Western society.  Why that particular choice must be respected is that to do otherwise would involve Western society in hypocrisy(!) in that it would be tantamount to forcing Muslim women what to wear.  (Of course, smoking a cigarette is a personal choice also, but trying doing that anywhere you like!)

He further argues that “right-wing, racists and bigots who long to see a blond-haired, blue-eyed, white Canada” are the ones fighting for Quebec’s Bill 62, and for that reason alone resistance to creeping Sharia Supremacism must be resisted.  (The irony of classifying one’s enemy in this by race and appearance is lost upon Khan arguing against "racism.")

He asks if we would be having this conversation in Dubai, India, Africa, or Turkey.  Well, I would invite Khan and his colleagues to go to those liberal and enlightened places and find out.  He might find congenial opinions in Dubai, Turkey, and certain countries in Africa, but in India, I doubt he would find a receptive audience for Sharia Supremacism.  If he tried to argue for Western cultural and legal supremacism in Dubai, Turkey, and Africa, he would be lucky merely to rot in prison.

What is the next Muslim cultural practice that we must tolerate - Female Genital Mutilation?

As a formally blond-haired but still blue-eyed white Canadian, let me say that Khan doesn’t understand squat about Canadian society.  If we can regulate smoking cigarettes, we can regulate the wearing of masks in public.  And to hell with Sharia Supremacism.  There are plenty of other places on earth to luxuriate in that.  Let Quebec be Quebec.
-30-


No comments:

Post a Comment