Progressive Cognitive Dissonance

Vincent J. Curtis

27 Nov 2017

RE: Gender chapters in trade deals & Trudeau calls on men to help end violence against women.

Canada's precious Prime Minister calls for men to end violence against women, and wants to include gender protection in a re-written NAFTA.

What is this talk of calling on ‘men’ to end violence against ‘women’?  What is the business of having ‘feminist’ gender chapters trade deals – when there are allegedly 57 genders?  Which of the 57 qualify as ‘feminine’?

These messages of progressivism don’t add up.  According to progressive gender theory, to which Mr. Trudeau unhesitatingly subscribes, ‘men’ and ‘women’ refer to social constructs unrelated to any underlying reality.  We are what we think we are, which explains why there are 57 genders and subgenders under progressivist theory, and not just 2, as those who believe in the science of biology and anatomy think.

So, how can those of one arbitrary social construct be called upon to stop their violence against those of some other arbitrary social construct, when there is such a thing as ‘gender fluidity’?  And which, precisely, of the 57 is Mr. Trudeau referring to when he says ‘men’ and ‘women.’?

Progressivism is in a state of cognitive dissonance when it upholds modern gender theory and admits of age-old problems that contradict modern gender theory.  Could it be that the science of biology is correct after all?  Why do progressives believe in some sciences but not others?  They believe in Climate "Science" but not biology.  They can’t have it both ways.

-30-