Spec runs hit piece on Tulsi Gabbard

Vincent J. Curtis

9 Feb 25

RE: Canada, start worrying about Tulsi Gabbard. Op-ed by Wesley Wark, a senior fellow at the Cetner for International Governance Innovation. The Hamilton Spectator 8 Feb 25.

Why is the Spectator running this shit-hit piece on Tulsi Gabbard? That desperate for content?  The Spectator knows squat about Tulsi Gabbard, and that goes for their boy, Wesley, who wrote the piece.

Their boy Wesley relies on Hillary Clinton for insight on Tulsi, that she’s “a Russian asset”? Tulsi Gabbard resigned as Deputy Chair of the DNC in 2016 and endorsed Bernie Sanders when she saw how the game had been rigged against Standers and in favor of Hillary. Their boy didn’t mention that.  Nor did he mention that Tulsi is opposed to “regime change wars’ such as the one Hillary launched against Muammar Gaddafi in 2013 (in which Canada participated).  So now, there are slave markets in Benghazi and Libya is the place where refugees depart for Europe. Thanks Hillary. Their boy didn’t mention why Hillary might bear a grudge against Tulsi.

As to her alleged lack of qualifications: so, qualified like James Clapper who lied to congress about not spying on U.S. citizens? (That’s what Trump wants to put her in charge: to stop these abuses.)  Tulsi has a Top Secret clearance already and a clean FBI background check. Their boy Wesley doesn’t have those creds.

As for Canada: Tulsi hasn’t said boo about Canada. How, exactly, does she “threaten the trust-relationship at the heart of our intelligence sharing” that Trump doesn’t already threaten? Their boy doesn’t say. What secrets to we have that she can’t be trusted with, given that ODNI isn’t a line collection agency (& therefore the U.S. has already)?

There’s lots more to say, but the Spectator has to stop publishing Democratic Party shit as if it were journalism. If Tulsi were working for a Democrat, they’d condemn what their boy said as blatant sexism.

-30-