Vincent J. Curtis
14 Nov 2016
Media which got everything wrong will now tell you all the
things that will happen as a result of the thing they said wouldn't happen.
Alan Dershwitz: “The One Thing Trump Will Do if He’s Smart.”
Bill Walen: Four
Takeaways from Trump’s Decision to Make Reince Priebus His Chief of Staff.
News Item: “Priebus’s first role is defending colleague
Bannon from accusations of racism, hate.”
Howard Kurtz: Media Buzz: “Can President Trump deliver on
his promises?”
News Item: “President-Elect
Trump Willing to Keep Parts of Obamacare”
News Item: Trump
Admits “There Could Be Some Fencing.”
News Item: “How Donald Trump Blew Up the Bond Market, and
Changed Everyone’s Views on Interest Rates.”
News Item: “Trump
faces backlash over appointing Steve Bannon as top aide, a choice critics say
will empower white nationalists.”
News Item: “In first
test, Trump makes big mistake”
News Item: “Reid Plans
to keep up anti-Trump barrage.”
Analysis: “How Donald
Trump won and almost all of us missed it.”
(Speak for yourself, ABC)
News Item: “Cracks are already starting to show between
Donald Trump and Republicans.”
News Item: “Trump’s Transition Team is just now learning
what a president does.”
The above is a selection of news items and opinion pieces I
picked off the web this morning. The
opening statement says it all and, with it in mind, reading the headlines of
the various stores and opinion pieces makes the authors seem ridiculous. Why media would bother themselves with what
critics say so soon after the election is not baffling. It is a sign of desperation, an attempt to
seem relevant, and effort to redeem themselves.
I don’t know why Donald Trump is giving the main stream media
the time of day. Yet, he did an
interview for the Wall Street Journal and the CBS news program “60 Minutes.” The media have advised Trump to hire Kelly
Ayotte (of all people!) to run the Department of Defense, as a means of
demonstrating an outreach to the disaffected parts of the Republican
Party. Stupid! The media learned nothing. Has it not occurred to them, that the
outreach should start from the other side?
Let’s hear Kelly Ayotte grovel a bit and admit she’s the one who made
the mistake concerning Trump.
The media commentariat have also been on Trump’s case
concerning his renewed use of Twitter.
So far as Twitter is concerned, Trump praised its valuable
use during the campaign, and said he planned to keep using it as president to
get his message out directly to the people.
We would not have known of the congratulations offered Trump by Jeb Bush
and Mitt Romney unless Trump had tweeted those facts, and media reported on the
tweets not the underlying story.
The media have a vested interest in separating Trump from
his followers. I expect news stories
fretting and worrying about Trump’s abandonment of the Special Prosecutor for
Hillary, about the Wall, about repealing and replacing Obamacare, about his use
of insiders for his transition team and cabinet when he promised to “drain the
swamp” and so forth.
For my part, I am not going to pay attention to media
reports that seem to create problems for Trump.
I’m going to let Trump take office, and hold any criticism for six
months, giving the man time to get his feet under him and begin to move on his
program.
The Affordable Care Act is going to get repealed. Repeal is psychologically necessary for
Republicans. Critics will try to portray
the replacement that keep some parts of Obamacare as a mean-spirited repeal in
name only, like retaining the same bung-hole and replacing the drum around
it. I expect insurance for those with
pre-existing conditions will find a place in the replacement, but the
individual mandate will be gone.
Medicare is going to have to be fixed, and I hope to see tort-reform as
part of the insurance package.
I expect that by March, 2017, Hillary’s fate will be
determined, at least insofar as the emails are concerned. The pay-for-play business of the Clinton
Foundation is an entirely separate matter, and she is not cleared of that. I pay no attention to Trump’s soothing words
at the moment concerning Hillary. He is
committed to nothing, and there will be the problem of equal justice for all if
he lets Hillary's known email crimes go uninvestigated.
I would like to see Trump nominate Ted Cruz as Justice
Scalia’s replacement on the Supreme Court.
Cruz is not on Trump’s original list, but who would be a more
Scalia-like justice? Regardless, Trump
is not going to let us down on that score.
When it gets around to the media covering Trump, I’m going
to subscribe to his Twitter feed and ignore the failed main stream media. I can judge for myself.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment