Vincent J. Curtis
8 July 2019
In the course of her testimony before the Senate Judiciary Committee evaluating the fitness of then-Judge Brett Kavanaugh for elevation to the Supreme Court, Christine Blasey Ford specifically denied knowing about or involvement in the use of hypnosis to change memory. Shortly after her testimony and after Kavanaugh’s confirmation was voted out of committee, there sprang rumors that she had in fact co-authored a paper on the very subject of the use of hypnosis to change, and even create, “memories.”
The paper involving therapeutic uses of hypnosis (involving the creation of artificial situations) co-authored by Christine M. Blasey:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/jclp.20496
Rachael’s Mitchell’s official report on Christine Blasey Ford’s testimony and allegations:
https://assets.documentcloud.org/documents/4952137/Rachel-Mitchell-s-analysis.pdf
The fact that Ford remembered distinctly that it was Kavanaugh who allegedly groped her in the manner she described, and of a witness to that event, but nothing else – not the year, not even how she got home, could be signs that the alleged memory was implanted by hypnosis. She recollects no details because they don’t exist and weren’t implanted. Ford appeared to sincerely believe what she was saying to the committee, and she would be sincere if a false memory had been implanted by hypnosis. She sincerely believes a false memory implanted into her sub-conscious.
On the Left, there are many people who are willing to be kamikazes for the sake of a higher good, and her testimony before congress may have been Ford’s kamikaze run.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment