Vincent J. Curtis
22 Aug 2018
RE: The Dawning of a New Age. (The Hamilton Spectator Aug 22, 2018)
Count me skeptical about the dawning of a new geologic age.
Geologic ages are shorthand for referring to periods of time
in the remote past that demonstrated characteristics of the planet of
importance to geologists. The current age, the Holocene, refers to the
period of time from the “end” of the last ice age to the present – about 12,000
years in length. There is no uncontroversial way to designate which
particular year or moment in time 12,000 years ago that marks the precise
moment that the last ice age ended. The boundaries are not that
sharp. The ice sheets began to retreat over several thousand years, and
they are still retreating.
So, what is so special about the creation of a new geologic
age beginning in the year 1950? A glance at the Global Warming hockey
stick graph shows 1950 as the year that the shaft turns into the blade.
There is a strong smell of “New Age” politics in the push to
declare a new geologic age. What is the name that paleontologists want to
call the new age? Why, the Anthropocene, even though man has existed for
over 400,000 years.
We won’t know for several thousand years hence whether a new
geologic age should be proclaimed or not, because it will take that long for
the new enduring characteristics of the planet to become observable and
significant to the scientists of that era.
The stench of post-modernist politics is too strong to
ignore that we should tamely accept as holy writ the alleged dawning of a new
geologic age – one characterized by western civilization messing up the planet.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment