16 Aug 2018
Progressivism and post-modernism have the habit of punching
themselves in the face. The attacks on Maxime Bernier is a case in point.
M. Bernier is what is known as a pure laine
Quebecker. That means he is a person from Quebec who is of French
culture, whose first language is French, and who can trace his ancestry to 18th
century Quebec. He belongs to precisely that kind of minority that is
supposed to be protected by post-modernist progressivism from what it finds as
the evil English culture. And yet English-accultured progressives accuse
him of being an ungrateful racist/sexist/homophobic/transphobic/Islamophobic
deplorable for asking what the limits of multi-culturalism are.
Imagine making the same accusations against Jacques
Parizeau. Absurd!
Canada was once an officially bicultural country – French
and English. In the midst of the national unity crises from the 1960s to
the 1990s, Pierre Trudeau introduced the notion of “multi-culturalism” as a
means of diluting the strength of English culture in Canada and to reassure
those of French culture that theirs remained safe inside the Canadian political
context.
M. Bernier is an ornament of national unity. When he
asks about the limits of multi-culturalism, he is asking serious questions that
go to the heart of what it means to be Canadian, and in particular
French-Canadian. Is one of the two founding cultures of Canada to be
reduced to the status of being just another raisin in the raisin pudding?
Is French-Canadian culture itself going to be subject to an assault on its
integrity and meaning? Finally, what is Canadian about unassimilable
cultures that exist in Canada?
Unlimited multi-culturalism raises serious questions of
state, and M. Bernier is not the first to ask questions of this type. (e.g. Is France still French if she is multi-cultural?)
He
deserves respectful and thoughtful answers, not catcalls.
But catcalls are all progressivism has when it is
questioned.
Canada’s national unity problem is only sleeping. When
a fellow like Maxime Bernier asks questions about the limits of
multi-culturalism, English-accultured progressives better have good answers
lest the slumbering problem awaken.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment