Vincent J. Curtis
20 June 2018
RE: Are sundresses the reason women don’t cycle? (Hamilton Spectator of that date)
It is amusing to watch progressives wrestle with social
questions these days. Observing a gaping gender difference in the highly
progressive sport of cycling, Councillor Lloyd Ferguson asked why that was,
offering as a reason women’s preference for wearing sundresses in summer caused
them to be uncomfortable riding bikes.
The chattering classes immediately exploded. Ferguson
was being his usual sexist, racist, xenophobic, homophobic, Islamophobic deplorable self,
they argued. However, ad hominem attacks on the questioner are not
answers to the question, and, sheepishly, they finally admitted it. If
they hadn’t women’s preference for sundresses was the only reason on offer to
explain the disparity.
Finally, the progressives settled on women’s perceptions of
safety being different from that of men accounted for the difference in
ridership. Men tend to be more physically reckless than women, and the
lack of safe bike paths made women less likely to bike. That is the
answer.
And so, the cause of gender difference in bike riding in
Hamilton is due to…….gender differences. A factor progressives labor
mightily to deny either exists or ought to exist.
Progressives, you owe Councillor Ferguson an apology.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment