Vincent J. Curtis
30 July 2016
In her acceptance speech at the Democrat National
Convention, Hillary said, “I BELIEVE IN SCIENCE!” to great cheering.
This is supposed to be a snide reference to her belief in
the theory of anthropogenic global warming, while her opponent, Donald Trump,
thinks it is a hoax. That makes her both
smarter and more moral.
Biology is a science.
Biology finds that the baby in her mother’s womb is a human being, and
has been from the moment of conception.
Hillary is famous for her advocacy for unencumbered abortion, sometimes euphemistically
described as “a woman’s right to choose,” or the even more banal, “women’s
health.” Hillary goes so far as
partial-birth abortion.
If Hillary believes in science, then she must accept that
abortion is the killing of an innocent human being.
What kind of a moral monster believes in the killing of an
innocent human being for any reason whatever?
So which is it?
Hillary believes in science whenever it is politically convenient, and
not otherwise? Or does she not know what
she is talking about? The former excuse
also points at a moral monster. The
latter cannot be entirely dismissed.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment