Wednesday, December 23, 2015

Islam and Natural Theology



Vincent J. Curtis

23 Dec 2015


In Pope Benedict XVI’s famous speech at Regensburg, the following passage occurs:

The decisive statement in this argument against violent conversion is this: not to act in accordance with reason is contrary to God's nature.[5] The editor, Theodore Khoury, observes: For the emperor, as a Byzantine shaped by Greek philosophy, this statement is self-evident. But for Muslim teaching, God is absolutely transcendent. His will is not bound up with any of our categories, even that of rationality.[6] Here Khoury quotes a work of the noted French Islamist R. Arnaldez, who points out that Ibn Hazm went so far as to state that God is not bound even by his own word, and that nothing would oblige him to reveal the truth to us. Were it God's will, we would even have to practise idolatry.[7]

The thrust of the argument that Pope Benedict made at Regensburg is uncontroversial in the Catholic tradition.  His point was to place religion on the same intellectual basis as science is, and to argue that the nature of God is the logos, that is, the word and reason.  This fact of logos is what makes God comprehensible, however imperfectly, to man.  In the passage above, he contrasted the orthodox Christian position in respect of religion with that of Islam.

Islam, Benedict argues, rejects Hellenic reasoning; that is, it does not accept the Law of Non-Contradiction.  Islam believes that Allah is transcendent, meaning that Allah is capable of contradicting himself and is entirely incomprehensible to man.  In his Regensburg speech, Benedict subtly invites the leading lights of Islam to debate religious matters on the basis of reason.  This they cannot do for by trying to reason with Benedict they would run into the Law of Non-Contradiction, which they must reject or be destroyed by it.  Perhaps Benedict was guilty of taunting the believers in Islam, and the fearsome rioting and violence against Christians around the world that followed the speech was the Islamic reply to that taunt.

Natural theology is that part of philosophy which treats of the traits of God and His attributes, as far as they can be known by reason.  Natural theology is divided into three principal parts: the first treats of the existence and unity of God, the second treats of the attributes of God in Himself; the third treats of the attributes of God in relation to the world or to his creatures.  Natural Theology is distinct from Sacred Theology in that the former is reason based on the sensible, while the latter is reason based on divine revelation.

Islam, as Benedict observed, must reject that a Natural Theology is possible.  On their view, Allah is not susceptible of analysis, and moreover is not bound by the laws of logic, in particular of the law of non-contradiction.  Therefore, if Allah exhibits attributes, there is no reason why these attributes cannot be different at a different time; and lacking any necessary consistency, divine attributes are not deducible by human reason.  (We shall see the consequences of this position below.)

Nevertheless, Muslims claim to know the mind of Allah all the time.  For example, Allah is described as “The Compassionate,” and “The Merciful.”  At various times in history Muslims attributed their military successes and failures to the favor or disfavor in which Allah held the Ummah.  Their early military successes Muslims hold to be proof of the truth of their faith and the favor in which they were held by Allah.  Muslims believe that Allah ought to favor them over all others in the world because they are the bearers of his last word.  As Benedict would point out, these incoherencies are possible because Islam rejects the law of non-contradiction.

Regardless of whether one is atheist or Christian, there is no disputing that Natural Theology is a rational discipline whose findings represent metaphysical demonstrations.  It is from Natural Theology that come the proofs of the existence of a monotheist God, as well as the attributes, both absolute and relative to man, that God must possess, expressed in ways that finite minds can understand.  From Natural Theology we gain an understanding of why the universe possesses the order that it does, and why it persists in existence.  Without these explanations, the order seen in the universe and the persistence of the universe in existence are completely mysterious.  Without the explanations of Natural Theology, the order and persistence of the universe remain brute facts without explanation.

Natural Theology says that the divine attributes are not known by man directly, but man can attain to a knowledge of them from the perfections which he discovers in creatures.  Here are a few of the findings of the necessary characteristics of God as derived by Natural Theology:

Aseity.  Aseity is the attribute by which God is of Himself or from Himself.  It is the primitive attribute from which Natural Theology can deduce all the others.

God is immutable, that is, His perfections can neither be increased nor diminished; He is subject to no alteration or change.  [From this perspective it follows that the Islamic belief that Allah is capable of change must be a projection of the limitations of the human mind upon the attributes of Allah.]

God is immense, that is, He is in His essence present to all things.  Since God is infinite or without limits, he is everywhere infinitely – in Himself, in the world, and even outside the world- in that He can fill all possible space extended ad infinitum, without the least circumspection of His being.

God knows Himself perfectly; He knows all things outside Himself, all future contingent and possible things.  It is this eternal and unchangeable affirmation of Himself that constitutes truth in itself, absolute and essential truth, the prototype and supreme norm of all truth.  God has a perfect knowledge of all real beings, because it is He who created them with their essences and perfections.  Since God by His knowledge is the cause of all things, His knowledge and His power have the same extent; and since He is the cause of all that exists in every individual, it follows that His knowledge embraces all beings also in their individuality.

God has a perfect will; he loves himself necessarily, all else He loves freely.  As it enters into the perfection of the will to communicate the good which one possesses, so it is consonant with the divine goodness to be in some way diffusive of itself to others.  But God does not will this absolutely and necessarily, because, being infinitely perfect, He needs nothing external to himself; since God’s knowledge is infinite, and therefore more perfect knowledge or “a fuller consideration of the matter and circumstances” as motives of repeal, is an utter impossibility.

God is omnipotent, that is, He can do every thing that does not imply a contradiction.

God being infinitely perfect, is eminently sufficient for Himself.  Yet it was fitting His goodness that others, viz, creatures, participate in His perfections; and therefore he created, that is, He drew out of nothing all that exists.

God loves all existing creatures, because they are good and come from Him; and He loves them the more the better they are, for they are better simply because God wills them to have more good.  With God, it is His love that is the cause of their existence and of the measure of goodness that He imparts to them.

(From these it also follows that:

Satan owes his existence to the action of God.)

The act of creation is an essentially free act of the divine will.  As God is eminently sufficient for Himself, he is in this act bound by no necessity, whether external or internal.  To hold that God made the world not by an act of His free will but from an irresistible impulse, is virtually to hold that God does not suffice for Himself, that He is not infinite, that he is not God.

The end which God proposes to Himself in creating the world is the manifestation of his perfections, or His own glory.  God, being infinite wisdom, must have had an end in the act of creation, and this end must be the manifestation of Himself and His perfections, particularly His power, His wisdom, and His goodness.  But since God is infinite, he can acquire nothing further for Himself, and the glory that accrues to Him from creation is purely accidental and extrinsic.

God is the first cause of all the beings of the universe, since He has given them existence by creating them; therefore they cannot cease to depend on Him for their existence; and they continue to exist only so long as he preserve it to them.

Although God can annihilate creatures, yet it is certain that he will never annihilate even one of them.  The gifts of God are without repentance, and having willed to give being to creatures, God, in a sense, owes it to His wisdom, Him immutability, and His glory, to preserve them.

If God does not exist, there is no longer good or evil, man may follow at will his most perverse inclinations, society is without foundation, and the law of might alone prevails.  History, besides, bears witness that all the epochs of atheism have been epochs of intellectual debasement, of moral corruption, and of great social upheavals.



If the above seems to savor of Christian beliefs it is because of the close connection between Hellenic reasoning and Christian revelation that developed in Christianity practically from the beginning of the Church.  (A criticism leveled at the Roman Catholic Church is that it is a religion conditioned by philosophy.)  The first discovery of a rational proof of the existence of a monotheist God was made not made by a Christian, but by the ancient Greek philosopher Aristotle, and the exposition of that discovery forms the last third of his work Metaphysics.  Benedict holds that the early encounter of Christian revelation and Hellenic reasoning was not “by chance.”

On analysis, the Islamic belief of the absolute transcendence of the being they call Allah necessarily implies that Allah is less than the being of absolute perfection, simplicity, power, love, wisdom, knowledge, immensity, and so forth of the God discovered by Natural Theology.  The being that Islam calls Allah lacks “aseity,” and because the being Islam calls Allah lacks aseity it is possible for this being to be self-contradictory, to be inconsistent, to change his mind, to play favorites among his creatures, to love some and to call that others be killed, and so forth.  In short, while undoubtedly powerful, Allah, in the Islamic belief, seems to display some of the weaknesses of man.  The consequence of imputing absolute transcendence to Allah, to make him capable of contradiction, is to render him not more powerful, but less powerful than the God of Christian belief.  Islamic scholars have never had to address this point, nor are they capable of addressing it because they reject the law of self-contradiction in respect of matters of religion.  The Muslim response, as was seen after Benedict’s Regensburg speech, was to react with violence rather than with counter-argument.

The question then arises, if Allah really exists, who could he be?

Natural Theology does not provide an answer to that question.  The answer to that question may lie in another medieval intellectual discipline.
-30-






No comments:

Post a Comment