31 July 2015
It would be fruitful for FoxNews to look into how documents get
classified in the U.S. government, and what briefings senior appointees from
outside the regular bureaucracy receive concerning the generation of classified
material.
For example, every cable originating from an overseas
embassy ought initially to be classified as “secret” or “top secret”, depending
upon the nature of the material. Political appointees as Ambassadors surely receive briefings, if not downright training sessions, on the sensitive material their embassy generates.
In Canada, the originator of a government document is the
initial authority for the classification of that document. He or
she can classify a document up to the highest level to which they are
cleared. Later, a document may be reviewed by those charged with
maintaining government secrets, and that subsequent authority can lower, or
increase, the security classification of the document, depending upon the
sensitivity of the material. The system in the United States cannot be too different from that.
As Secretary of State, Hillary ought to be generating
classified documents constantly. Her deliberations with her staff ought
to be initially classified as secret, and any advice she tendered to the
President ought to be considered as secret or top secret, initially.
In short, anything substantive pertaining to her job as
Secretary of State ought to be initially classified as secret, or top secret by Hillary, herself! She ought to have received a briefing upon her
assumption of office on the protocols concerning the generation, handling and
classification of sensitive material.
If FoxNews or similar news outlet can find a retired bureaucrat who can explain how
sensitive material is classified in the U.S. government, they can blow the lid off
Hillary’s statement that she handled no classified material on her personal
server. Her recommendation that her staff look into the advice of Sidney
Blumenthal ought to have been classed as “secret.”
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment