Vincent J. Curtis
4 Dec 14
My hometown newspaper served as the audience for some thoughts on the Michael Brown and Eric Garner deaths. I agree with Mark Steyn that police training is such that the killing of Michael Brown occurs all to often in the United States, but also in Canada. Such training, I contend, is the logical consequence of forcing smaller and weaker people onto police forces out of political correctness, as indicated below.
Sirs;
The United States is suffering an outbreak of rioting from
the deaths of two black men, Michael Brown of Ferguson, Missouri, and Eric
Garner of New York City. Both men were killed by police officers in the
course of their arrests.
The police procedures which led to the killings of these two
men are directly traceable to the cause of political correctness which was
foisted on police departments decades ago by well-intentioned people.
It used to be that police officers were, as a rule,
physically large, strong, and intimidating people. One respected the
police officer because of the consequences to you if you gave him guff.
But the regime of political correctness thought it wrong that small, physical
weak, and unprepossessing people could not make it onto police forces.
Political pressure changed that.
The street did not change, however. To compensate for
the physical weakening of the average police officer, police training had to
change. Weaponry was added, and police were trained to use weaponry of various
kinds in automatic response to a failure to comply on the part of a member of
the public. The old-fashioned punch in the mouth was replaced with a
Taser, often from multiple officers. You can’t expect a female police
officer to physically overpower a male who is resisting arrest, and so she has
to use a weapon to subdue the perp. Thus the tactics of the weak
gradually came to be the standard operating procedures of police forces under
the rule of political correctness.
Michael Brown was three hundred pounds, and tall. The
police officer who tried to arrest him said he felt like a child next to
Michael Brown. Physically, he proved to be no match for Michael Brown
when the latter assaulted him and resisted arrest. The police officer
used a weapon to subdue Brown, just as he had been trained to do. There
is no telling what would have happened if the police officer had been taller
and stronger than he was, and had looked upon Brown as an opportunity for
practice with a night-stick instead of a Glock.
Eric Garner was a street vendor who sold untaxed cigarettes
for a living. He could make a living because New York City taxes
cigarettes at over $4.50 per pack. Garner had over 31 arrests for this
non-violent crime. Like Michael Brown, Eric Garner was physically large
and intimidating, and he resisted arrest. Video of the arrest show Garner
being set upon by four or five police officers, one of which had him in a
chokehold. That chokehold, and the pressure of several police officers on
top of him caused Eric Garner to suffocate. The Grand Jury in the Garner
case refused to press charges against the police, much to the surprise of
outside observers who would normally support the police. (I put it down
to jury nullification, New Yorkers who are familiar with the Eric Garner type
and have no use for them.)
The police officers who arrested Garner looked tiny in
comparison to Garner, who was physically larger than most NFL linemen.
However, two linebacker-sized police officers should have been enough to subdue
Garner. Instead, four defensive-back sized officers set upon him.
Police training, combined with a lack of confidence in their own physical
prowess caused these officers to use more physical force than was necessary to
secure compliance.
Something similar happened in Hamilton recently in the Steve
Mesic case.
It may have been thought a good thing to have police forces
more closely resemble the community they police. More women, more
minorities, and fewer big white guys. Perhaps that is so. However,
cases in which police kill the perpetrator in the course of arrest point to the
advantages of having a police force that more resembles a football team than
the cheer-leading squad.
-30-
No comments:
Post a Comment