Wednesday, July 25, 2018

Andrea Horwath proves me right!


Vincent J. Curtis

25 July 2018

On Monday, July 23, the Spectator saw fit to publish a letter of mind, penned a week earlier.  It ran as follows:


Having taken a week off for vacation, I returned to peruse the last week of Spectator issues.  The most striking thing was the level and the quantity of hysteria both in opinion pieces and even in alleged news pieces.

We read that Trump is a fascist.  Trump is Putin’s poodle.  Trump doesn’t deserve to be treated fairly or honestly.  Ford is Trump.  The use of the 1998-2015 Sex-Ed curricula endangers our students.  Social conservatives are inherently evil.  Jordon Peterson is a fascist, and so must be the guy who rents him a hall to speak in.

People need to get a grip.  One reason why Trump has an unshakeable hold on a large core of supporters, is the hysteria that comes from his opponents.  Anti-Trumpers are dismissed as simply finding new ways of venting their hysteria.  The little-leaguers go after Ford with an obviousness that is tedious.

It must be that the progressives realize that they are losing, and are losing their minds over it.
                               *                                  *                                                  *

It didn’t take Andrea Horwath, leader on the Ontario NDP, long to validate my claim that progressives were losing their minds after she attacked Premier Ford that very day in the legislature on the Sex-Ed issue.  He’s a radical extremist, beholden to his wicked, social conservative base, and regression in Sex-Ed was their payoff, she says.

“…prevent kids from learning about consent, cyberbullying, gender identity, and LGBTQ families” she said.

(Poor progressive Andrea is not educated enough herself to understand the intellectual farce that is gender-identity theory.  Teaching gender-identity as fact is like teaching the discredited caloric theory of heat or the phlogiston theory of combustion as fact.)

Year Zero fanaticism was identified during the French Revolution.  The revolutionaries were going to create a new man and a new society from scratch, disregarding all common sense.  Year Zero was the date of the Revolution.  The experience with this led to the French saying, “drive away Nature, and she returns at a gallop.”

The fact that a Sex-Ed program last used in 2014 is beyond the pale, and only the 2015 program is sufficient is a sign of Year Zero fanaticism.  What about the Ontario students who went through school in the 1960s, when there was no sex-ed program to speak of?  How did they figure out how to produce Gen X and Gen Y without 2015 approved instruction?  How did mankind make it through the last 40,000 years without there even being an Ontario Ministry of Education?!

The implication is that Andrea Horwath holds the millennial generation in utter contempt, believing them unable, without detailed instruction, to figure out how to reproduce.

If I were more charitable, I would think that Andrea’s real objection is not the education, but the morality that is transmitted through the new program.  That is entirely Marxist in orientation, and explains her concern for the satisfaction of social conservatives.  What defines social conservativism except a position on moral rectitude and propriety?  Andrea finds these people inherently evil, and I’m sure, given the chance, she would deprive them of the right to vote and the right to free expression.

With the fall of the Soviet Union, Marxism was exposed as an utter failure.  Committed Marxists turned their attention to the criticism, the undermining, and the bringing low of successful, western democracies that have free-market economies.  The Global Warming hysteria is of a piece with this.  Breaking down social morals and encouraging division based on race and class are other targets of this underground Marxian criticism.

What progressive-Marxist Andrea wants to preserve in the 2015 program is the moral code, because it is much more destructive of Judeo-Christian morality and of Western values than the 2014 program was.  And this is entirely in keeping with modern Marxism.

Of course, I could be giving Andrea more credit than she deserves.  She could be simply be giving an utterly knee-jerk, opportunistic reaction to change.
-30-




No comments:

Post a Comment