Thursday, March 12, 2015

Harper calls Muslim face-covering veil 'anti-women,' unacceptable


Vincent J. Curtis

11 Mar 15

A response to the CP article of this headline. 


Justin Trudeau, Charlie Angus, and other quasi-intellectuals of the left are quite right to take Stephen Harper to task for his condemnation of certain Muslim practices.  Harper does Islam the disservice of taking Islam seriously.

Elitist leftist like Trudeau and Angus are inclined to treat Islam as some harmless, quaint religious practice to be cherished and valued as an anthropologist would cherish the discovery of the religious practices of a recently discovered tribe of the Amazon jungle.  However, Islam is anything but harmless.

In the first place, Islam treats women as second-class citizens, contrary to the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.  An expression of the shabby treatment of women is the obligation for women to wear certain clothing lest they be treated as prostitutes or available women.  Though the niqab and the burka are not strictly a part of Islam, it became an Islamic cultural practice for women to wear such clothing as a sign that as tribal breeding stock they were already spoken for.

The hijab has an altogether different history.  The hijab originated in the 1970’s as a sign of Islamic support for the Palestinian cause against Israel, and evolved into a sign of political Islam as such.  In effect, the woman wearing the hijab is saying that she is Muslim first, last and always, and Canadian somewhere far down the list.  And being a Muslim woman means to be inferior to a Muslim male and superior to non-Muslims.

Politically, Canada can withstand a small number of people who bear no loyalty to her; but it is a farce for a woman wearing a hijab, a niqab or a burka to take an oath of loyalty to Canada when plainly they are demonstrating the absence of such loyalty.  They might as well be crossing their fingers before the citizenship court judge.  It is quite permissible for such people to live as they wish in Canada as landed immigrants, but if they want the full rights of citizenship then they ought to accept Canadian law, such as the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and not say they do while withholding true consent.

The basis for tolerating these face-covering practices is a combination of ignorance and arrogance.  Stephen Harper knows enough about Islam and the law to realize the hazards of allowing Muslims to avoid taking seriously the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
-30-





No comments:

Post a Comment