Thursday, December 26, 2024

Climate Quackery

Vincent J. Curtis

26 Dec 24

RE: Health care and the climate crisis. By Wendy Levinson. Op-ed the Hamilton Spectator 26 Dec 24.

Professor of Medicine Wendy Levinson of the University of Toronto is another climate activist to whom the Spectator has lent its platform.  Let’s ignore for the moment that there is no climate crisis, according to 2022 Nobel Laurate in Physics, Dr. John Clauser.  Let’s ignore for the moment that the “carbon dioxide causes bad weather” thesis is falling apart as the censorship of free speech is eased.  Let’s ignore for the moment that Canada’s contribution to so-called greenhouse gas emissions is insignificant. Let’s focus on the hard evidence offer by Dr. Levinson to make her specific claims.

All the evidence are percentages of this and that under the unwarranted assumption that these are dangerous to the climate: she offers us accounting games without references. We have no evidence of the quality of her non-data: who made these estimates, and based on what?  Never mind that percentages of nothing aren’t hard data anyhow.

It doesn’t occur to her to consider the costs of reducing use these medications, or of any other of her recommendations. What does it cost the patients in pain and survivability to allegedly save the climate? She has no analysis of that. It doesn’t occur to her to say that medicine is too important an area to cut.

Dr. Levinson is another half-informed climate activist whose disastrous recommendations would cost her nothing if implemented.

-30-

Tuesday, December 24, 2024

Dismiss with costs

Vincent J. Curtis

24 Dec 24

RE: Ontario asks court to hear youth-led climate case. The Canadian Press; published in the Hamilton Spectator 24 Dec 24.

Canada has the Notwithstanding Clause to make sure of parliamentary supremacy, and that the courts don’t have the final say, as they do in the United States.  It is therefore strange for Ontario to ask the Supreme Court to hear a case, brought allegedly by “young people” but in fact funded by activists, to challenge Ontario’s so-called “climate plan.”

The case alleges that the Charter provision for their right to life is violated by Ontario’s emissions targets. The case would require the court to decide what Ontario’s emission targets ought to be.  While the court could make this decision, the rationale would be arbitrary, and it would open to the door to all sorts of other challenges to government policies based on some theory of personal endangerment. The construction of Highway 413 could be challenged, for example, both for and against construction based on some theory of general endangerment to life from traffic flow.

But there is no science backing the claim of these youths.  Their theory would hold that their lives would be endangered if they moved to Florida or to Hawaii, due to the warmer climate of those places; and this in itself ought to falsify the endangerment claim.  A second definitive disproof is Ontario’s contribution to climate change, insofar as any can be shown at all, is dwarfed by the contributions of the rest of the world. It is simply implausible to claim that Ontario’s action, or lack thereof, endangers the lives of these “youths” in any provable way.

Case dismissed; plaintiffs pay costs!

-30-

Sunday, December 22, 2024

Climate con is science success

Vincent J. Curtis

22 Dec 24

RE: Big success for Canadian science. By Abhiraj Lamba. The Hamilton Spectator 21 Dec 24.

Taxpayers ought to know that climate change is a talisman by which scientists con grant money out of the government.  If you want to study the sex life of the salamander, just say you want to study how climate change affects the sex life of the salamander and the money is yours.

So it is with this success of researchers at the University of Waterloo.  They wanted to see if, by satellite spectroscopy, they could determine the concentration of HFC-125 in the middle atmosphere.  What was the justification? Why, climate change!  HFC-125 has 3500 times the “global warming potential” of carbon dioxide!

This is elaborate nonsense. What they’re actually talking about is the absorption coefficient of HFC-125 at a particular frequency in the IR spectrum.  Absorption coefficients drop as concentration rises in orders of magnitude; and they’re comparing a gas at a concentration in the pptv range to CO2 at 400 ppmv, a million times more concentrated than HFC-125. A poor bureaucrat is easily bamboozled with this elaborate handwaving.  The effect of doubling HFC-125 in the atmosphere is the equivalent of adding 2 ppm of CO2 to the atmosphere, which might add a thousandth of a degree to global temperature; and that’s it, at best.  (Note, neither CO2 nor HFC-125 are sources of heat, and the alleged global warming effect is due to heat retention due to BB-IR absorption.)

The triumph of Canadian science is two-fold: being able to measure HCF’s in the middle atmosphere by satellite spectroscopy; and bamboozling a bureaucrat and the public to get the money.

-30-

Monday, December 16, 2024

A Linney Christmas

Vincent J. Curtis

14 Dec 24

RE: Don’t be a Scrooge this Christmas. OP-ed by Grrant Linney. The Hamilton Spectator 14 Dec 24

Grant Linney may think “A Christmas Carol” is the movie of the Christmas season, but for me the ultimate Christmas movie is “Die Hard.”  But what’s a secular grinch to do this Christmas season except to turn the customs of this time to political use?

Grinch, er, Linney complains of the richest one percent being too rich; he falsely claims that the oil and gas industry received $7 Trillion in subsides (Oh, I’m sure he can quote a source for this, but it remains fanciful accounting nevertheless); and oil & gas are to be censured again for daring to lobby on behalf of the industry. He complains of Canadian banks for their association with the oil and gas industry. (Are we noticing a pattern here?) The Federal Conservative party is to be censured for opposing a worthless carbon tax, fossil fuels having fanned the forest fires that caused the evacuation of Yellowknife.

But we can atone for our sins by following Linney’s example of goat-giving. The giving of goats as gifts, to third world children.

You’re all bad people, you understand? Especially, if, like me, you prefer Bruce Willis to Alastair Sim as your Christmas hero. Don’t acquire; give to people you don’t know; suffer; remorse; reduce your carbon footprint, and be miserable, for there’s and O&G executive having dinner with a banker somewhere and laughing it up on the strength of a $7 Trillion handout.

-30-

Saturday, December 14, 2024

Rejoice: She’s lost hope!

Vincent J. Curtis

13 Dec 24

RE: Feeling hopeless about the climate emergency? Op-ed by Tricia Clarson a “Climate Change Columnist” The Hamilton Spectator 13 Dec 24.

Tricia Clarkson has lost hope that rising CO2 emissions will ever be reduced in time to meet 2030 targets. Her groan was occasioned by the election of Donald Trump as U.S. president, and “Sadly, Trump will be the only president in the world that has declared climate change a hoax.”

This may technically be true, as neither Presidents Xi of China nor Putin of Russia has said as much; nor has Prime Minister Modi of India, but those three countries collectively are responsible for over 50 percent of global CO2 emissions, and those leaders act like it’s a hoax. The United States is responsible for only 14 percent, and Canada only 1.5 percent.

Dr. John Clauser, 2022 Nobel Laurate in Physics, offers hope.  He declared in his keynote address at the Quantum Korea 2023 Conference, “There is no climate crisis, and climate change does not cause extreme weather events.” Clauser has also said, after examining the climate models, that he was appalled at the poor quality of the science that went into them.

Clarkson sighs over nothing. Climate change is a hoax; the 2030 targets are nonsense; and even if they aren’t there’s absolutely nothing Canada and the United States can do about rising CO2 emissions.

-30-

Friday, December 13, 2024

Low carbon fuelishness

Vincent J. Curtis

12 Dec 24

RE: B.C. refinery creates low carbon jet fuel. By Chuck Chiang, The Canadian Press.  The Hamilton Spectator 12 Dec 24.

If you used the term, ”bio-diesel” or “methyl oleate” you’d get a ho-hum reaction; but use “low-carbon jet fuel” and you create a sensation.  Low carbon jet fuel: what a great idea!

The expression “low-carbon” is a sales gimmick, as there is no standard for saying that a liquid hydrocarbon is “low” or “high” in carbon.  What makes the molecules of these fuels different from the molecules of ordinary jet fuel is the presence of oxygen in them.  Already one can see the folly in the “low carbon” claim: the hydrocarbons in these being already partially oxidized, it means you must burn more of it to get the same amount of energy as from burning a non-partially oxidize molecule.  You can’t beat thermodynamics.

If the B.C. refinery can make lots of money selling their “low carbon” jet fuel: good on them, for they’re putting one over on the gullible. Noteworthy is that the refinery is calling on the Federal government for a subsidy to make more of their product.

-30-

 

Wednesday, December 11, 2024

Solar Panel Con

Vincent J. Curtis

10 Dec 24

RE: City using green cash to add solar panels on ambulances. News item the Hamilton Spectator 10 Dec 24.

With great fanfare and smiles, the city allowed itself to be climate-conned with this purchase of solar panels that are to be installed on the roofs of ambulances. The alleged purpose of the panels is to power the electrical equipment inside the vehicle without need to run the engine.

But the equipment won’t be run off the panels directly; the equipment will be powered by a battery, and the purpose of the solar panels is to recharge the battery.

This arrangement is elaborate nonsense. A deep-discharge lithium-ion battery is capable of being recharged from the engine of the ambulance itself, just at the lead-acid battery of the ambulance already is.  A lead-acid battery fails quickly when subject to even a few deep-discharges, but a lithium-ion battery handles repeated deep-discharge well.  The ambulance’s engine is let to idle to prevent the lead-acid battery from deep-discharge.  The normal operation of the ambulance engine is sufficient to recharge both its lead-acid and a separate lithium ion battery that powers the equipment in the back when the engine is turned off.  The expensive and foolish elaboration of this exercise is the substitution of solar panels for the vehicle’s engine as the means of recharge.

The taxpayers are getting conned again because their representatives are too easily dazzled by enviro-nonsense.

-30

 

Monday, December 9, 2024

What is the militia?

Vincent J. Curtis

7 July 24

What is a militia? What was the militia?  Though a term now somewhat archaic, the Canadian Army Reserve is still sometimes referred to colloquially as “the militia.” The word militia appears in the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. 

To offer the broadest definition, a militia is the set of military aged males capable of bearing arms.  In Canadian history, the militia was often divided into the sedentary militia and the active militia.  The active militia referred to formed military units under the command, and, usually, though not always, in the pay, of the colonial or Dominion government, and to the membership of those units.  The sedentary militia referred to those males of military age capable of bearing arms who were not members of any organized military unit under the command of a colonial or of the Dominion government.  The sedentary militia were often, though not always, the largest component of the militia in Canada, and were looked upon as potential conscripts for a defense force of the colony or of the Dominion. (Potential conscription for defense was not abolished in Canadian law until 1950).

In modern Canadian history, the first Militia Act was passed in 1855 by the colonial government of the Province of Canada, and was occasioned by the departure of most British regular army units for the Crimean War.  The Act created a Non-Permanent Active Militia (NPAM) and a Permanent Active Militia (PAM), sometimes called the Permanent Force, which today would be regarded as s cadre Regular Force.  There was no life like it: volunteers were paid 5 shillings a day for ten days training per year, while artillery units were paid for an outrageous twenty days per year.  However, the men had to provide their own uniforms. The Active Militia was called out during the Fenian Raids of 1866.  The Act also created the office of Minister of Militia and Defense, which title existed until 1923, when it changed to its current Minister of National Defence.

The Militia Act of 1868 continued the colonial arrangements of pre-confederation.  In 1869, there were 37,170 volunteers serving in the Active Militia, and 618,896 in the Sedentary Militia.  The Militia was mobilized for the Fenian Raids of 1870, the Red River Expedition of 1870, and the North West Rebellion of 1885.

The Second Boer War saw Canada send over 8,000 volunteers overseas for service in South Africa, and for this purpose Canada created a Special Service force. The Militia was expected to defend Canada, but service overseas was another matter; and for organizational and legal purposes the Special Service Force was established.

A separate, legally distinct entity for overseas service was continued in World War I. Sam Hughes threw the entire mobilization plan overboard and into confusion by organizing the Canadian Expeditionary Force along numbered battalion lines instead of on existing militia battalions. The CEF was managed by the Minister of Overseas Military Forces

On the advice of CGS Harry Crerar, the term militia was, on November 19, 1940, abolished and replaced by army: thus, the Canadian Army (Overseas), Canadian Army (Active) and Canadian Army (Reserve). The term militia was briefly revived in the 1950s when the reserves were renamed Canadian Army (Militia), which, in turn, was abolished and renamed (Reserve).

Following WWII the successors to the PAM and NPAM became, respectively, the Canadian Army Active Force and Canadian Army Reserve Force.  Korea again saw the creation of an Army Special Force comprised of many volunteers with WWII experience.  In 1954, the reserve was renamed the Canadian Army (Militia).  After unification in 1968, the Army was renamed Mobile Command, and the Militia was redesigned Mobile Command (Reserve). In 1993, it was renamed Land Force Command (Reserve), and finally, in 2011, was renamed Canadian Army (Reserve).

“The Militia” in Canada is not some hoary anachronism; though obsolete today, the term is properly expressive of the historical development of today’s Canadian Army, both Regular and Reserve.

-30-

 

Friday, December 6, 2024

Isn’t Christmas awful?

Vincent J. Curtis

5 Dec 24

RE: Reduce your environmental impact at Christmas. Op-ed by Susan Koswan. The Hamilton Spectator 5 Dec 24.

Susan Koswan writes, “Isn’t Christmas awful? It creates such a mess.” (though not in as few words as put here, but that is the inevitable conclusion.).

“Zero Waste Canada calculates that our waste jumps by 25 percent over the [Christmas] season.”

Who cares what totalitarian fanatics say? Zero Waste Canada: their name gives the absurd game away.

Koswan quotes the never-before-heard-of Columbia Climate School “production and use of household services were responsible for 60 percent of global greenhouse gas emissions.”, which claim ought to embarrass those who look askance at Alberta’s oil and gas emissions.

“Packaging accounts for 45 percent of carbon emissions from e-commerce…that is responsible for 36.4 percent of total transport emissions.”

Susan Koswan did not check the math; she did not examine the assumptions behind any of these figures. She can’t verify the claims of these manifestly totalitarian, activist, extremist organizations; she can only urge them on you with that assuring smile of moral superiority.

You can be certain of one thing: 95 percent of social statistics likes these are completely made up.